|
Canku Ota |
|
(Many Paths) |
||
An Online Newsletter Celebrating Native America |
||
May 17, 2003 - Issue 87 |
||
|
||
History of the Ottawa
and Chippewa Indians of Michigan |
||
by ANDREW J. BLACKBIRD, Late U.S.
Interpreter, Harbor Springs, Emmet Co., Mich.
|
||
credits: submitted
by Timm Severud (Ondamitag)
|
NOUNS. Common nouns in the Ottawa and Chippewa language are divided into two classes, animate and inanimate. Animate nouns are those, which signify living objects or objects supposed to have life, as persons, animals and plants. Inanimate nouns signify objects without life. A third form of nouns is derived from these two classes, called diminutive nouns. These are formed by the termination "ens" or "ns" placed upon other nouns. The plural of animate nouns is usually formed by adding the syllable "wog" to the singular; if the word ends in a vowel, only the letter "g" is added; and sometimes the syllables "yog," "ag," or "og." All
words are pronounced with accent on the last syllable.
The
plural of inanimate nouns usually terminates in an, en, on, or n.
Nouns
have three cases, nominative, locative and objective. The locative case
denotes the relation usually expressed in English by the use of a preposition,
or by the genitive, dative and ablative in Latin.
This relation can be expressed by the word "pin-je," as "Pin-je aw-kick,"--in the kettle; "E-naw-bin pin-je aw-kick,"--do look in the kettle; but this form is seldom used. It is employed only for great emphasis or formality. The locative termination is "ong," "eng," or "ing." The objective case is like the nominative when the subject is in the 1st or 2d person, but when the subject is in the 3d person the object takes the termination "won." Example
of locative and objective cases. Chicago is derived from sha-gog-ong,
the locative case of the Ottawa word she-gog, meaning skunk; nominative,
she-gog; locative, she-gog-ong; objective, she-gog or she-gog-won.
Gender
is distinguished by the word "quay," either prefixed or added to nouns,
to indicate he feminine.
Proper names always form the feminine by adding "quay." Ce-naw-day; Irishman.Ce-naw-day-quay; Irishwoman. Some
genders are irregular.
Diminutive nouns take the same modifications as the nouns from which they are derived. Verbal and adjective are modified to agree with the animate or inanimate nouns to which they belong, as will be illustrated hereafter. PRONOUNS Personal pronouns have no distinction of gender in the third person singular. A peculiarity of this language is the two forms for the first person plural. These two forms for pronouns, and for verbs in all moods and tenses, are like each other except in the first syllable. In one form the first syllable is always "Ke," and in the other "Ne." The form commencing with Ke is used only when speaking to one person, and that commencing with Ne, which might be called the multiple form, is used whenever more than one person is addressed, even though no word may appear in the sentence indicating how many. This is an idiosyncrasy, which perhaps would never have been developed, certainly would not be perpetuated, in any except an unwritten language. It is of no effect except is a language always colloquial. The multiple form will be given in this grammar as the first person plural, and, whether indicated or not, the other may be understood as being the same with the change of the first syllable from Ne to Ke. PERSONAL PRONOUNS Singular
and Plural.
When these personal pronouns are connected with other words, or when they become subjects or objects of verbs, the first syllable only is used or pronounced. In the third person of verbs the pronoun is entirely omitted. Singular and Plural.
The
whole pronoun is sometimes used when the emphatic or intensive form is
desired, as,
POSSESSIVE PRONOUNS Ne-daw-yo-em, Mine; Ne-daw-yo-em-e-naw, Ours. Ke-daw-yo-em, Thine, Ke-daw-yo-em-e-waw, Yours. O-daw-yo-em, His or hers, O-daw-yo-em-e-waw, Theirs. Emphatic form--nin ne-daw-yo-em etc., throughout all the different persons. When these possessive pronouns are used with nouns, nearly all the syllables are omitted, except the first, which is added to the noun is the plural; as--
The
emphatic form, "my own hat," is made by prefixing the personal pronouns,
as--
THE IMPERSONAL PRONOUN The
impersonal pronoun "maw-got," plural "maw-got-on," may be represented
by the English impersonal or neuter pronoun it, but it has a wider significance.
The inanimate subject of a verb is also represented by maw-got or maw-got-on.
Wa-po-tchin-ga maw-got, or wa-po-tchin-ga-sa maw-got, it strikes; plural,
wa-po-tchin-ga maw-got-on, or wa-po-tchin-ga-sa maw-got-on, they strike.
Au-nish, interrogative pronoun what; au-naw-tchi, relative pronoun what; e-we, relative pronoun that. ADJECTIVES Adjectives take two forms, agree with the animate or inanimate nouns to which they belong. Comparison of adjectives is made by other words: O-ne-zhe-she (inanimate o-ne-zhe-shin), good; Maw-maw-me (or ne-go-ne) o-ne-zhe (or -shin), better; Au-pe-tchi o-ne-zhe-she (or -shin), best. A fourth degree is sometimes used: Maw-mo-me o-ne-zhe-she (or shin), very best. The words "Me-no" and "Maw-tchi" or "Mau-tchi," do not change when used with other words, and they are the most common adjectives in the Ottawa and Chippewa languages; they are used as adverbs, as well as adjectives."Me-no," is equivalent to good, right, and well; and "Mau-tchi," is equivalent to bad, wicked, evil; as Me-no au-ne-ne, good man; Me-no au-quay, good woman; Me-no au-way-sin, good animal; Me-no au-ky, good land; Me-no waw-bo-yon, good blanket; Me-no e-zhe-wa-be-sy, good behavior, or kind; Me-no au-no-ky, he works well, or doing good business; Me-no pe-maw-de-sy, he is well; Me-no au-yaw, he is getting well, or convalescent from sickness; Me-no au-no-kaw-so-win, good utensil, or handy instrument; Me-no wau-gaw-quat, good ax; Me-no ke-zhi-gut, good day, or pleasant weather; Me-no au-no-kaw-tchi-gon, good goods, or nice goods; Me-no e-zhe-wa-be-sy, he or she is kind or good; Me-no maw-tchaw maw-got, it goes well, etc. The word "Mau-tchi" is equally useful; as, Mau-tchi au-ne-ne, bad man; Mau-tchi au-quay, bad woman; Mau-tchi e-zhe-wa-be-sy, bad behavior, or wicked person; Mau-tchi may-ne-to, evil spirit, or the devil; Mau-tchi ke-ge-to, wicked language, or profanity; Mau-tchi wau-gaw-quat, bad ax; Mau-tchi ke-zhwa, vulgar speaker; Mau-tchi no-din, bad wind; Mau-tchi au-naw-quot, bad cloud; Mau-tchi ke-zhe-got, bad day, or rough weather; Mau-tchi wig-wom, bad house, or wicked house; Mau-tchi au-no-ke-win, bad business, etc. Another adjective equally comprehensive is Kwaw-notch: Kwaw-notch au-ne-ne, well-behaved man; Kwaw-notch au-quay, pretty woman; Kwaw-notch au-no-ke-win, good business; Kwaw-notch au-no-kaw-tchi-gon, nice goods; Kwaw-notchi-won, pretty or nice (inanimate); Kwaw-notchi-we, pretty (animate); Au-pe-tchi kwaw-notchi-we au-quay, very pretty woman. The
following illustrate the changes of form in adjectives for animate and
inanimate:
It will be observed that the last one or two syllables of the adjective are dropped when in connection with a noun.
|
|
||
|
||
Canku Ota is a free Newsletter celebrating Native America, its traditions and accomplishments . We do not provide subscriber or visitor names to anyone. Some articles presented in Canku Ota may contain copyright material. We have received appropriate permissions for republishing any articles. Material appearing here is distributed without profit or monetary gain to those who have expressed an interest. This is in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. | ||
Canku Ota is a copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 of Vicki Lockard and Paul Barry. |
||
The "Canku Ota - A Newsletter Celebrating Native America" web site and its design is the |
||
Copyright © 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 of Paul C. Barry. |
||
All Rights Reserved. |