Steve Inskeep is a co-host of NPR's "Morning Edition" and the author
of "Jacksonland:
President Andrew Jackson, Cherokee Chief John Ross, and a Great
American Land Grab."
Studying the 19th century is like being a parent. You have flashes
of recognition that your children behave as you once did. You wonder
if your ancestors acted like you, too.
Similar patterns emerge when researching the political ancestors
of modern leaders. The 1820s and 1830s the era when our modern
democracy began to take shape were full of recognizable figures,
such as a Georgia governor who fulminated in 1825 against a perceived
conspiracy by Washington elites. (He was paranoid that Supreme Court
justices and an untrustworthy president would free his state's slaves.
Today his political positions are outdated, but his rhetoric lives
on.)
Even more striking is an early-19th-century civil rights leader.
Nobody called him that, of course. But John Ross fought for his
rights with tactics that perfectly prefigured America's 20th-century
civil rights battles.
What people actually called Ross was an Indian. Eventually,
he was the principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, resisting efforts
to drive his people out of their historic homeland in north Georgia
and the surrounding states. Seeking to influence a democratic society,
John Ross of Georgia used tactics similar to those of Martin Luther
King Jr. of Georgia. Their parallel experiences say much about what
has and hasn't changed in America.
Ross was of mixed race. His ancestors included Scottish traders
who lived among Cherokees in colonial times and married Cherokee
women. Born in 1790, he grew up in a changing world. Cherokees had
been an independent nation for centuries but were overwhelmed by
spreading white settlement in the early 1800s.
Unlike many Indian leaders, who rebelled against the new order,
the Cherokees decided to join it. They signed treaties accepting
the protection of the federal government. They adopted white styles
of clothing, religion and business. Some including Ross
copied the white use of enslaved laborers.
Ross's English-language skills and education suited him for
leadership during this time of adaptation. "We consider ourselves
as a part of the great family of the Republic of the U. States,"
he wrote early in his career. He aspired to make the Cherokee Nation
a U.S. territory or state.
That was never likely. White settlers wanted Indian land, not
the Indians on it. Today, schoolchildren learn the ending of the
story: the Trail of Tears in 1838, when 13,000 Cherokees were forced
to move west to what is now Oklahoma. Thousands died during that
time the victims of a ruthless, government-sponsored campaign
of segregation.
Less well known is the long prelude to this disaster. Ross spent
more than 20 years fending off expulsion. His epic battle against
Andrew Jackson, the iconic hero of the United States' emerging democracy,
did much to shape the nation we inherited.
As a young man, Ross joined the Cherokee Regiment, raised to
assist the United States in the War of 1812. The unit fought in
an Army commanded by Gen. Jackson. When the war ended, Ross highlighted
his military service. Joining a Cherokee delegation to Washington,
he argued that Cherokees had proved their "attachment" to the United
States in war, so their rights must be respected. Ross also recruited
newspapermen, who described that service in print.
He was pioneering a tactic that African Americans would later
use. Frederick Douglass urged black men to enlist in the Civil War
and earn the freedom of black slaves ("Let us win for ourselves
the gratitude of our country, and the best blessings of our posterity
through all time"). A much-decorated black regiment called the Harlem
Hellfighters returned from World War I expecting equality. This
didn't always work African Americans, of course, would wait
decades before winning civil rights but it worked for Ross
in 1816. Federal officials handed Cherokee heroes ceremonial rifles
to commemorate their service and awarded them a temporary victory:
The government blocked a plan to seize 2 million acres of Cherokee
land. That plan had been orchestrated by their former commander,
Jackson, who was in charge of military affairs in the South.
In 1828 Jackson was elected president. He was on his way to
founding the Democratic Party, and he was profoundly expanding presidential
power. He was also determined to move numerous Indian nations west
to make way for white settlement. He said it would be better for
Indians to be "free from the mercenary influence of white men."
Some Indians agreed that they were endangered by white culture,
greed and guns, and had already moved. But most did not.
To lobby against this separate-but-unequal scheme, Cherokees
under Ross started a newspaper, the first ever published by Native
Americans. Just as later generations of African Americans would
make themselves heard in the pages of the Chicago Defender, Cherokees
spoke through the Cherokee Phoenix. Copies were mailed to other
newspapers, and its articles were reprinted widely, spreading Cherokee
perspectives.
And like later civil rights leaders, Ross found white and religious
allies. He appealed to white missionaries who proselytized to Native
Americans. The Cherokees flipped the missionaries, who spread word
back to the white population that Cherokees were Christian, civilized
and worth defending. They activated a powerful network of preachers,
publishers and politicians. One Christian writer and activist wrote
two dozen articles against removal in the National Intelligencer,
the era's nearest approximation of the Washington Post. He even
encouraged a national movement of women, who could not vote but
petitioned Congress.
The agitation was not quite enough. In 1830 Congress narrowly
passed, and Jackson signed, the Indian Removal Act, offering transportation
and land to natives who "voluntarily" moved west of the Mississippi.
Yet Ross refused to give up. Facing pressure from Georgia, which
imposed racist laws on the Cherokee Nation, Ross sued, much as the
NAACP later sued in Brown v. Board of Education.
Ross scratched together money for a legal team. He personally
made a hazardous trip to deliver a summons to Georgia's governor,
fearing that no one else could be relied upon to do it. The Supreme
Court threw out the case on a technicality, so Ross pursued another
case, Worcester v. Georgia , which succeeded in early 1832. Georgia
had imprisoned two white missionaries who supported the Cherokees.
Chief Justice John Marshall's magisterial opinion said the missionaries
must be freed: Georgia had no right to impose its laws in the Cherokee
Nation, where Cherokees were "the undisputed possessors of the soil,
from time immemorial."
Incredibly, Marshall's ruling came to nothing. Georgia refused
to recognize it. Jackson denounced it and used sharp political maneuvering
to make it go away. (His administration quietly arranged for the
missionaries to be freed, making the court case moot, and he simply
ignored Marshall's broader finding.) Denied the shelter of the law,
Ross steeled his people for passive resistance, in the spirit of
the nonviolent civil rights demonstrators of the 1960s. Ordered
to leave in the spring of 1838, Cherokees instead planted crops
as if they'd be around for the harvest. The government sent soldiers
to begin expelling the tribe. In defeat, Ross had one consolation:
The Army's rousting out of peaceful Indians fixed this tragedy in
our national memory. "You can expel us by force," Ross wrote in
1838, ".?.?. but you cannot make us call it fairness."
Passive resistance also yielded some practical results. Horrified
by the prospect of a humanitarian disaster, federal officials at
least improved the terms of removal. Ross's Cherokee government
was promised more than $6 million for its land, probably a fraction
of its real value but still a substantial sum. In exchange, Cherokees
agreed to organize their own journey west rather than going at bayonet
point. Ross billed the government for the Cherokees' travel, charging
every cent he could.
The final departure of Cherokees and other native nations made
way for the creation of what we call the Deep South, with its economy
based on plantations worked by black slaves. On this same ground,
more than 100 years later, a new movement for minority rights emerged.
One reason Cherokees could not prevail is that American institutions
were less developed than they later became. Imagine if, in 1954,
President Dwight Eisenhower had defied or undermined Brown v. Board
of Education.
There was a deeper reason, though. While American democracy
was expanding in the early 19th century to embrace nearly all white
men, including those from poor backgrounds, like Jackson, it remained
an openly racist democracy: government "on the white basis," as
Jackson's political heir Stephen Douglas later put it during the
Lincoln-Douglas debates. In the 1830s, even some of the Cherokees'
political sympathizers saw them as an inferior race whose doom was
inevitable. The great Sen. Henry Clay publicly declared that honor
required the United States to uphold Indian rights, but he privately
said that Indians' extinction would be "no great loss to the world."
Later generations of Americans began to confront that underlying
racism, recognizing that government "on the white basis" must be
wrenched onto a broader and stronger foundation. This made it possible
for minority groups to secure their rights using tactics that did
not quite work for John Ross. We are indeed repeating the patterns
of our ancestors, but we are gradually enjoying different results.
|
Cherokee
chief John Ross (Library of Congress Prints and Photographs
Division)
|
|